Brown and Ruprecht, PC | Attorneys at Law
  • Home
  • Attorneys
  • Areas of Service
  • Contact Us
  • Menu Menu

KANSAS MAY REQUIRE YOU TO EXHAUST YOUR ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES BEFORE YOU ARE ENTITLED TO PAYMENT ON A PUBLIC JOB

March 18, 2019

March, 2019

A recent Kansas Court of Appeals case exposes the danger of failing to exhaust administrative remedies when contracting with a public entity. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court ruling dismissing all claims of the prime contractor for its failure to comply with the Kansas Judicial Review Act (“KJRA”) and its contractually negotiated administrative remedies prior to filing suit. In doing so, the court held the KJRA applies to construction contracts, just as it does to other contracts with public entities.

Kansas State University (“KSU”) and Crossland Construction Company, Inc. (“Crossland”) entered into a contract where Crossland served as the prime contractor in the construction of a new residence hall on the KSU campus. Treanor Architects, P.A. (“Treanor”) entered into a contract with KSU to serve as the project architect and engineer. Crossland entered into a subcontract with Otis Elevator Company (“Otis”) to install the elevator in the new residence hall. A dispute arose between Crossland and Otis regarding the elevator system to be installed. Crossland submitted Otis’s shop drawings that included the elevator system it wanted to use. Treanor rejected those drawings, interpreting the contract to require a different elevator system. Due to the elevator system disagreement, Crossland terminated its subcontract with Otis. Following the termination of Otis, Crossland hired a replacement subcontractor, paying a substantial markup.

Roughly one year after Treanor rejected Otis’s shop drawings, Crossland submitted a Proposed Change Order (“PCO”) requesting over $1.3 million as compensation for the additional expenses it incurred related to the elevator system disagreement. The PCO had to be approved by several parties, including Treanor and KSU. The PCO was denied.

After attempts by Crossland to settle the matter by alternative dispute resolution, Crossland filed suit against KSU, Treanor, Otis and Otis’s insurer, Liberty Mutual (Crossland and Otis along with Liberty Mutual later voluntarily dismissed their claims without prejudice). KSU, joined by Treanor, moved to dismiss Crossland’s Petition for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required by the KJRA and the parties’ contract. The trial court granted KSU and Treanor’s Motion to Dismiss holding that Crossland was required to appeal its breach of contract claim against KSU, a state agency, pursuant to the KJRA and the administrative remedies provision in its contract. The trial court explained that because Crossland did not follow the administrative remedies provision in the contract, Crossland had failed to exhaust its administrative remedies. Crossland appealed the trial court’s ruling.

The court of appeals affirmed the trial court ruling explaining that the KJRA requires a party to exhaust all administrative remedies available within an agency in a breach of contract case against a state agency before filing a petition for judicial review. Further, parties may contractually include administrative remedies in their contract, which in turn must be exhausted before filing a petition with the trial court. Crossland did not bring its claim to the Director of the Office of Facilities and Procurement Management within 10 days of Treanor’s decision to deny the shop drawings, as required by the contract. Crossland further failed to file its petition for judicial review within 30 days of the agency action. Thus, Crossland did not exhaust its administrative remedies prior to filing its petition. Also, the court of appeals held that the agency action, which triggered the KJRA and the contractual remedies, was Treanor’s denial of the shop drawings, rather than the denial of the PCO. 

As a practical matter, if one has contracted, or intends to contract, with a Kansas public entity, one should seek counsel to determine one’s statutory and contractual obligations regarding contract disputes. Kansas courts have held that failure to comply with the KJRA and other contractual administrative remedies requirements is a waiver of all claims against the public entity. The outcome of the Crossland case may seem counterintuitive, but it stands for the principle that what you don’t know can hurt you, especially if you are doing public work in Kansas.

Case citation: Crossland Constr. Co. v. Otis Elevator Co., 2018 Kan. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1005 (Ct. App. Dec. 28, 2018).

 

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail

Recent Posts

  • KANSAS MAY REQUIRE YOU TO EXHAUST YOUR ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES BEFORE YOU ARE ENTITLED TO PAYMENT ON A PUBLIC JOB
  • LOTTERY WINNINGS CAN BE ASSIGNED TO SECURE A LOAN UNDER MISSOURI LAW
  • KANSAS SUPREME COURT ADDRESSES A PASSENGER’S LIABILITY TO ANOTHER PASSENGER
  • Attorneys from Brown & Ruprecht, PC Named to Missouri and Kansas Super Lawyers
  • Attorneys from Brown & Ruprecht, PC Receive Tier 1 Ranking
  • The Best Lawyers in America®
  • Brown & Ruprecht, PC Establishes White Collar Criminal Defense and Internal Investigations Practice Areas
  • Attorneys from Brown & Ruprecht, PC Receives Tier 1 Ranking
  • Attorneys from Brown & Ruprecht, PC Named to Missouri and Kansas Super Lawyers
  • Heather F. Shore selected to receive the 2013 Influential Women Award from Kansas City Business Magazine

Archived News Releases

Archived News Releases

February-2019-Legal-Update.pdf

Amount "Billed" Versus Amount "Paid" [Dec. 2009]

Brown & Ruprecht Attorneys selected for inclusion in Missouri and Kansas Super Lawyers (2010)

Heather Shore selected for inclusion in Missouri and Kansas Super Lawyers - Top 50 Women Edition (2010)

Stephen S. Brown Honored with KCMBA's Congenial Counselor Award (2011)

Stephen S. Brown Named "Best of the Bar" by the Kansas City Business Journal (2011)

Heather Shore Named "Best of the Bar" by the Kansas City Business Journal (2011)

Brown & Ruprecht Attorneys selected for inclusion in Missouri and Kansas Super Lawyers (2011)

G. Steven Ruprecht and William DeBauche recognized as "Best Lawyers in Kansas City" (2011)

U.S. News & World Report awards Brown & Ruprecht with a First-Tier Ranking in Construction Law and Construction Litigation Areas (2011)

Stephen S. Brown, Matthew M. Merrill and G. Steven Ruprecht Named

Brown & Ruprecht Attorneys selected for inclusion in Missouri and Kansas Super Lawyers (2012)

"A Top Medium Sized Firm" (2012)

William DeBauche and John Hayob included in The Best Lawyers in America® (2013)

Heather Shore selected to receive the 2013 Influential Women Award from Kansas City Business Magazine

Kansas City Business Journal recognizes Stephen Brown and Steven Ruprecht as "Best of the Bar" (2013)

Stephen Brown, William DeBauche, John Hayob and Heather Shore included in The Best Lawyers in America® (2014)

Super Lawyers and Rising Stars (2013)

Firm Receives Tier 1 Ranking (2014)

Brown & Ruprecht, PC Establishes Two New Practice Areas (2014)

The Best Lawyers in America® (2015)

Super Lawyers and Rising Star (2014)

Firm Receives Tier 1 Ranking (2015)

Our Newsletters

Our Newsletters

Kansas Supreme Court Addresses A Passenger’s Liability To Another Passenger [Sept 2015]

Law Adapts to the Digital World [2007]

The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 [2007]

Fund Trustees Should Examine UBS Downturn [August 2008]

Value of Medical Treatment in Missouri Post-Tort Reform: Amount Billed vs. Amount Paid [Oct. 2008]

Res Ipsa Loquitur Theory Allowed in Medical Malpractice Cases in Missouri [Oct. 2008]

Deadline Approaches for Compliance with New Immigration Law [Nov. 2008]

Recent Verdicts and Opinions in Kansas and Missouri [Dec. 2008]

Welfare Benefits 2008 Year in Review: Michelle's Law Mandates Certain Benefits for College Students [Jan. 2009]

Welfare Benefits 2008 Year in Review: Bailout Bill Includes Provisions for Mental Health Parity [Jan. 2009]

Welfare Benefits 2008 Year in Review: Medicare Secondary Payer Mandatory Reporting [Feb. 2009]

Welfare Benefits 2008 Year in Review: Effects of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act [March 2009]

New Missouri Law Requires Immediate Action by More Than 500,000 Businesses [March 2009]

Homeowners Under Threat of Foreclosure Seek "Short Sale" [Oct. 2009]

EEOC Proposes Regulations Implementing the ADA Amendment Act of 2008 [Nov. 2009]

The New Federal Acquisition Regulations Require Your Business to Have a Compliance Plan, Ethics Training and Internal Controls [Jan. 2010]

Supreme Court Reaffirms Final Bankruptcy Court Orders are Enforceable Even if Erroneous Under the Law [April 2010]

Employees May Now Claim Wrongful Discharge Based on Violation of Public Policy [Sept. 2010]

The Estate, Gift and Generation Skipping Tax - Where Are We Now? [Dec. 2010]

New Missouri Mechanic’s Lien Statute on New Residential Property [Jan. 2011]

Brown & Ruprecht, PC Successfully Navigates the Corbin Park Storm [April 2011]

Federal Service-Disabled Veterans Set-Aside Program [July 2011]

Davis-Bacon Act Subcontractor's Obligation to Pay Prevailing Wages [Sept. 2013]

Kansas Raises its Cap on Noneconomic Damages; Missouri Tries to Reinstate its Cap on Malpractice Damages [Sept. 2014]

Other Publications

Other Publications

New Missouri Law Requires Immediate Action by Certain Contractors (Heather Shore)

The New Federal Acquisition Regulations Require Your Business to Have a Compliance Plan, Ethics Training and Internal Controls (Heather Shore)

New Missouri Law Affects Mechanic’s Lien Rights on Residential Property (Heather Shore)

Construction Conflict Management (Heather Shore) - Commercial Journal

Contractors Face Some Onerous New Requirements (Steve Ruprecht) - Ingrams Magazine

General Construction Contracts with Delegated or Shared Design (Heather Shore and Michael Callahan) - Shared Design, Chapter 7

Enforcing Forum Selection Clauses after Atlantic Marine (2014)

Miller Act One-Year Statute of Limitations: Jurisdictional or Claim Processing Rule? (2014)

Navigating Surety Claims on a Federal Project (2014)

© Brown & Ruprecht, PC   |   Contact Us   |   Privacy Policy & Disclaimer   |   All Rights Reserved   |  

Link to: LOTTERY WINNINGS CAN BE ASSIGNED TO SECURE A LOAN UNDER MISSOURI LAW Link to: LOTTERY WINNINGS CAN BE ASSIGNED TO SECURE A LOAN UNDER MISSOURI LAW LOTTERY WINNINGS CAN BE ASSIGNED TO SECURE A LOAN UNDER MISSOURI LAW
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top